The Great Human Experiment
Same Sex Marriage in our schools
Would you willingly abandon your child to the moral whims of a teacher whose moral agenda you hardly know? Now you don’t have to choose. California has chosen for you.
Human experimentation without consent has been outlawed since before Nazi Germany. Wikipedia’s page on Nazi Human Experimentation says: “Prisoners were coerced into participating: they did not willingly volunteer and there was never informed consent.” Now this is the United States, not Nazi Germany, but some of the elements are uncomfortably similar. Change is here, as Mayor Newsom says, “whether you like it or not”, and parental consent is not part of the deal.
According to teachers in Hayward California, change includes what amounts to immoral social experimentation on children, as gay activists use schools to promote their lifestyle choices. This unlimited access to our children’s moral education is mandatory as we found out in Hayward this week. It is wrong to do experimental research on human beings, yet that is exactly what is being done with our most impressionable children, as same-sex marriage and other gay and lesbian issues are being taught in California.
Under the guise of anti discrimination education, some schools are using tolerance laws (SB 71) as a cover for gay indoctrination in our classrooms, because under this law parents are not informed and are not allowed to object to what’s taught. Schools say it’s ok because it’s all under the guise of lessening “discrimination” and “raising awareness.” In Deerfield Illinois where similar tolerance laws are enforced, 14 year old children were given instruction on gay and lesbian issues at school and had to sign agreements not to tell their parents what they learned. Is this “raising awareness?”
Wait! Didn’t Superintendent of Public Instruction’s Jack O’Connell say on TV that we would be able to opt out of such material? Not so. This startling information is from the flyer given to kindergarten parents in Hayward:
“Anti bias trainings covering gender, sexual orientation, or family are not sexual education. Therefore, parents do not need to be notified of this instruction and they may not remove their children from it.”
–Letter to Hayward Parents
Schools are increasingly saying: We have rights to your children! and gay and lesbian groups have access to our schools through tolerance laws. What about our rights to our children? “Parental rights”, according to gay groups, “have never meant that a parent can demand prior notice and the right to opt a child out of mere exposure to ideas in the public schools that a parent disapproves of.”
What effect will teaching young children about homosexual lifestyles have on our society? On our children? We don’t know for sure, but the studies we have available to us are alarming. These are a few comments from scientifically interested observers to the greatest human experiment ever conducted in the United States:
–When I look at what’s happening in California, I think there’s a lot to be learned to explore how human beings relate to one another,” said Sondra E. Solomon, an associate professor of psychology at the University of Vermont. (from The New York Times)
–Dr. Meilee Clunis and Dr. Dorsey Green write on page 243 of “The Lesbian Parenting Book’ that “It will be interesting to see over time whether lesbian sons have an easier or harder time developing their gender identity than do boys with live-in fathers”
Those who contend that there are controls on the indoctrination of our children need to read the news. Hayward California Schools have proven that parents absolutely could not opt out from having their children indoctrinated in gay issues.
This is social experimentation at it’s worst. Why should California’s youngest be the guinea pigs for the nation? In Hayward, our children were “coerced into participating: they did not willingly volunteer and there was never informed consent.” Human Experimentation wasn’t right for Germany in the 20th century and it’s not right for the United States today.
See the flyer parents were sent home here:
District gags 14-year-olds
‘Confidentiality’ promise requires students ‘not to tell their parents’
By Bob Unruh
© 2008 WorldNetDaily.com
Deerfield, Ill., High School, where officials required students to attend a “gay” indoctrination seminar
Officials at Deerfield High School in Deerfield, Ill., have ordered their 14-year-old freshman class into a “gay” indoctrination seminar, after having them sign a confidentiality agreement promising not to tell their parents.
“This is unbelievable,” said Matt Barber, policy director for cultural issues for Concerned Women for America. “It’s not enough that students at Deerfield High are being exposed to improper and offensive material relative to unhealthy and high-risk homosexual behavior, but they’ve essentially been told by teachers to lie to their parents about it.”
In what CWA called a “shocking and brazen act of government abuse of parental rights,” the school’s officials required the 14-year-olds to attend a “Gay Straight Alliance Network” panel discussion led by “gay” and “lesbian” upperclassmen during a “freshman advisory” class which “secretively featured inappropriate discussions of a sexual nature in promotion of high-risk homosexual behaviors.”
School Clams Up on ‘Gay’ Pledge Cards Given to Kindergartners
Saturday, November 01, 2008
A California school system refuses to say what action, if any, it will take after it received complaints about a kindergarten teacher who encouraged her students to sign “pledge cards” in support of gays.
During a celebration of National Ally Week, Tara Miller, a teacher at the Faith Ringgold School of Arts and Science in Hayward, Calif., passed out cards produced by the Gay, Lesbian and Straight Education Network to her class of kindergartners.
The cards asked signers to be “an ally” and to pledge to “not use anti-LGBT (lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender) language or slurs; intervene, when I feel I can, in situations where others are using anti-LGBT language or harassing other students and actively support safer schools efforts.”
The school has acknowledged that the exercise was not appropriate for kindergartners.
Parent Adela Voelker, who declined to be interviewed in depth for this report, said she was furious when she found her child’s signature on one of the cards. She said she contacted a non-profit legal defense organization specializing in parents’ rights.
Meanwhile, a school board member, Jeff Cook, says some type of action should be taken. “We have a general rule that all instruction should be age appropriate, and this clearly was not,” said Cook, who has served on the school board for five years.