Planned Parenthood in Complicit Statutory Rape Coverup

Video: Mona Lisa Documentary Exposing Planned Parenthood’s Felony Crimes

Against Women and Children

Thanks to CRFI for this update on the Mona Lisa Project.  This is the group that helped get the thugs from planned parenthood kicked out of Orange County in California.

“If an adult-child sex relationship is revealed—Law Enforcement must be contacted immediately.”  —Arizona Law

See your tax dollars at work in Arizona as they cover up the statutory rape of a 15 year old girl.  These people have no place being a publicly funded organizations in our communities.  They ought to have no place doing business anywhere.

—Beetle Blogger

Planned Parenthood Hides Statutory Rape in AZ

Planned Parenthood employees in two Phoenix clinics covered up the statutory rape of a minor girl last July 9, as seen in video footage released by Live Action Films on Wednesday.

“There’s another problem. He’s a lot older than me,” said Jackie Stollar, a college student posing as a pregnant 15 year old in the documentary-style film.

This is the fourth installment in the Mona Lisa Project, a national undercover investigation of Planned Parenthood, conducted by the college students who run Live Action Films. Each release shows clinic employees ignoring or willing to hide cases of statutory rape.

In Phoenix, Stollar entered a clinic at 5651 N. 7th St. and told a staff member about her problem. “My boyfriend’s like — ‘you need to get this taken care of ’cause I’m gonna get in trouble,’” she said.

“Is he older?” the staff member asked. “I mean everything’s confidential here, you know what I mean?” she said.

“He’s 27,” said Lila Rose, President of Live Action, who acted as Stollar’s 15 year old friend. Rose is also an undergraduate.

“The main concern is that nobody’s forcing you to do something that you don’t want to do,” clinic staff told Stollar during their conversation, after confirming that she wanted the abortion.

Arizona law makes adult-minor sex a felony and mandates the reporting of such crimes.

The girls were at their second clinic of the day, seeking counsel on how to obtain a judicial bypass so that Stollar would not need to notify her parents. “From what I hear, it’s a very easy process,” a Planned Parenthood employee at the first clinic told them.

When Stollar expressed concern at the first clinic that a judge would ask about her boyfriend’s age, she was advised to confide in the Planned Parenthood counselor. “She wants to help anybody who comes to her,” a staff member said.

“By keeping information about rapists confidential, Planned Parenthood enables sexual predators to continue violating young girls,” Rose said on Wednesday.

“What we need is a strong attorney general or county attorney. . . to really take this evidence seriously,” she said.

Planned Parenthood did not return a call for comment.

Watch the seven minute documentary online and see earlier editions of Mona Lisa videos on the Live Action website.

Video: Statutory rape concealed

Merriam Webster takes on Legislative and Judicial Powers Unilaterally Declaring Homosexual “Marriage” in New Definition

webster_marriage_definition

Dic⋅tion⋅ar⋅y: (n.)

Subversive tool for forcing social change

If you go by the book, the controversy over the definition of marriage has now ended.  Rather than wait for the country to work out it’s course on marriage, Webster has stuck the proverbial finger in the wind and decided for us.

Webster has now added the words:  “the state of being united to a person of the same sex in a relationship like that of a traditional marriage”  to the definition of marriage.

What is Webster’s thinking?  Perhaps they are tired of pouring over the same old dusty volumes of accurate definitions….perhaps they want to run for office? Why weigh in on this hot a topic if not to throw the fight by leveraging the substantial influence of a professional dictionary in the word wars?

In my book, a dictionary is something you can rely on for accurate definitions. Not the latest opinion piece. Leave that to the Op-Ed section.

See this response from Webster reported at the WorldNetDaily:

“We often hear from people who believe that we are promoting – or perhaps failing to promote – a particular social or political agenda when we make choices about what words to include in the dictionary and how those words should be defined,” associate editor Kory Stamper wrote in response.

“We hear such criticism from all parts of the political spectrum. We’re genuinely sorry when an entry in – or an omission from – one of our dictionaries is found to be offensive or upsetting, but we can’t allow such considerations to deflect us from our primary job as lexicographers.”

Lexicographers?  Since when is changing the timeless definition of marriage congruent with any type of scientific word analysis?

Merriam Webster is counting on name recognition to pull off this subversive societal swindle, but there are always consequences to reputation.  Trading in their chips of reliability and accuracy for political power and societal influence is a risky scheme.

This transparent attempt to sway public opinion to align with their liberal agenda reaches beyond the bounds of plausibility.  In my scrabble happy family, this is a mortal mistake.

—Beetle Blogger

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 146 other followers