Carrie Prejean & the great photo scandal

miss california 2

Carrie’s Response is Classy (as always)

It’s an interesting paradox: Carrie’s detractors are using her own Christian beliefs in order to denounce her as an un-fit advocate for traditional marriage.

From Carrie’s media rep:

"This was a photo that was taken several years ago, when Carrie first started modeling. In her naiveté, an agent convinced her to pose for this photo to submit to a lingerie company, claiming they could make her the next Victoria’s Secret model. She has since learned what a lie that was, and what a mistake it was to have the photo taken." [source]

From Carrie PreJean:

SAN DIEGO, May 5, 2009 /PRNewswire via COMTEX/ —-"On April 19, I chose to answer a question during the 2009 Miss USA pageant in an honest and personal manner that expressed my views of the long-established definition of marriage as being between a man and a woman. That answer, and my commitment to stand by my beliefs, has since resulted in attacks on me and my integrity as a woman. We live in a great country; a nation that was built on freedom of speech and freedom of religion. Yet my comments defending traditional marriage have led to intimidation tactics that seek to undermine my reputation and somehow silence me and my beliefs, as if opinion is only a one-way street.

"I am a Christian, and I am a model. Models pose for pictures, including lingerie and swimwear photos. Recently, photos taken of me as a teenager have been released surreptitiously to a tabloid Web site that openly mocks me for my Christian faith. I am not perfect, and I will never claim to be. But these attacks on me and others who speak in defense of traditional marriage are intolerant and offensive. While we may not agree on every issue, we should show respect for others’ opinions and not try to silence them through vicious and mean-spirited attacks.

"With that in mind, I will continue to support and defend marriage as the honorable institution it is. I will continue to stand with the overwhelming majority of the American people and the voters of my home state of California. If this whole experience has taught me anything, it is our precious right to speak freely, and how we as Americans can never allow anyone or any group to intimidate or threaten us to keep silent." [source]

She may lose her crown. That is justly up to the pageant officials. The ironic twist is that Christians believe in concepts of change and repentance.  She stood up for her beliefs, and continues to stand for her beliefs— as she should. The photos were never published. And as someone who, for a short and very hilarious time, was interested in the modeling “scene” (if you will), I’ll tell you that taking topless or otherwise revealing photos is a regular part of business. When a girl is seventeen, it’s pretty hard to see through dishonest intention.

 

<>the pomegranate apple

————————————–

Education, Not Indoctrination! Stop Harvey Milk Day in CA Public Schools

harvey_milk_educationPhoto by Jamison

Protect children from ”Harvey Milk Day” in California public schools
Action Alert: Oppose the pro-gay “commemorative exercises” of SB 572

Children are already being indoctrinated into the homosexual lifestyle in government schools, but a new bill in the California Legislature would make things much worse.

SB 572 by homosexual activist state senator Mark Leno of San Francisco, a Democrat, would create an official “gay day” called Harvey Milk Day. It would be pushed on every California government school, affecting children as young as kindergarten.

TAKE ACTION NOW

1. EMAIL: Use SaveCalifornia.com’s Email Lobbying System right now to send a pre-written message opposing SB 572 to Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger and your California state legislators.

2. PHONE: All day Tuesday, call the 6 Democrats and 3 Republicans on the Senate Education Committee to urge them to oppose SB 572. The committee will hear and vote on SB 572 this Wednesday, May 6 at 9:30 a.m. in Room 4203 of the State Capitol in Sacramento.

Six Democrats who all support the homosexual agenda
Gloria Romero of East Los Angeles (916) 651-4024
Elaine Alquist of San Jose / Gilroy (916) 651-4013
Loni Hancock of Alameda County  (916) 651-4009
Carol Liu of Pasadena / Glendale / San Gabriel Valley (916) 651-4021
Alex Padilla of L.A.’s San Fernando Valley (916) 651-4020
Joe Simitian of Palo Alto / Santa Cruz (916) 651-4011

Three Republicans who generally vote pro-family
Bob Huff of Glendora / Yorba Linda (916) 651-4029
Abel Maldonado of Santa Maria / San Jose (916) 651-4015
Mark Wyland of Carlsbad / San Juan Capistrano (916) 651-4038

California’s liberal “Republican” Governor
Call Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger to urge him to veto SB 572 if it reaches his desk. Tell him, “I want you to oppose Harvey Milk Gay Day in public schools like you did last year. This bill takes away from academics, parents don’t want it, and children don’t need it. Veto SB 572.” Call the Governor to leave a message at (916) 445-2841.

ABOUT SB 572

SB 572 pressures public schools — from kindergarten on up — to perform “suitable commemorative exercises” promoting what homosexual activist Harvey Milk believed in: the entire homosexual, bisexual, and transsexual agenda and anti-religious values.

Unfortunately, there is no definition or limit to the “exercises” the bill would make students do every May 22, which SB 572 would label “Harvey Milk Day.”

If SB 572 becomes law, schoolchildren would have positively portrayed to them homosexual experimentation, homosexual “marriages,” sex-change operations, and anything else that’s “in the closet.” Like he did last year, Governor Schwarzenegger should veto this very inappropriate bill, which has nothing to do with academic excellence.

The text of SB 572 states that “On Harvey Milk Day, exercises remembering the life of Harvey Milk and recognizing his accomplishments as well as the contributions he made to this state” should be conducted; specifically, “all public schools and educational institutions are encouraged to observe…and to conduct suitable commemorative exercises.”

How will children in government schools be taught and how will children’s minds be “exercised” under SB 572? The answer is children will be taught to remember, recognize and commemorate whatever Harvey Milk believed or is said to have believed, such as:

  • Religion is DANGEROUS: “More people have been slaughtered in the name of religion than for any other single reason. That, my friends, that is true perversion.” (Harvey Milk, speaking at a homosexual rally in 1978.)
  • All doors of sexual experimentation MUST be opened: “If a bullet should go through my head let that bullet go through every closet door.” (Harvey Milk quote)
  • If you think you might be homosexual, you MUST declare yourself gay or lesbian: “Milk believed strongly that coming out was the responsibility of every gay man and woman.” (Source)
  • Gay and lesbian “marriages” are good and natural: “So much of the spirit represented with the Supreme Court’s decision last week is the spirit of Harvey Milk and his legacy manifesting today in real change.” (San Francisco Mayor Gavin Newsom on the unveiling of a bust of Harvey Milk at city hall, May 28, 2008. (Source)

Harvey Milk may be popular in San Francisco and West Hollywood, but he is not popular or admired by most California parents who want healthy sexual boundaries for their children and don’t want the tearing down of every sexual boundary and standard like Harvey Milk did. Children belong to their parents, not to the state!

California parents don’t want and children don’t need “Harvey Milk Day.” There’s a big difference between a movie and school “exercises.” People voluntarily go to a movie, perhaps even to see “Milk” starring Sean Penn. Yet under SB 572, children CANNOT be excused and it will be MANDATORY for them to participate in pro-homosexuality, bisexuality, transsexuality “exercises” under SB 572. For there is no explicit parental opt-out in the bill. For this reason alone, SB 572 should be defeated.

SaveCalifornia.com

Democracy or Republic?

“A Republic, if you can keep it.”

As Benjamin Franklin left Independence Hall at the close of the Constitutional Convention, he was asked by a woman on the street:

“Sir, what have you given us?  A Republic or a Monarchy?”

“A Republic!” Franklin replied, “If you can keep it.”

In the Pledge of Allegiance we all pledge allegiance to our Republic, not to a democracy. “Republic” is the proper description of our government, not “democracy.”

Which is better?  Why?

A republic and a democracy are identical in every aspect except one. In a republic the sovereignty is in each individual person. In a democracy the sovereignty is in the group.

But as this video points out, there are some interesting trends regarding Democracy that make it unstable.  An interesting view.

—Beetle Blogger

D.C. Recognizes Out-of-Town Genderless Marriage

dc-neuters-marriage

"First Step" Toward Granting Licenses

The AP article is openly reporting that the new law prepares for official neutered marriage in our nation’s capitol. I know D.C. has funky representation issues, but once again a marriage law is created without consulting the people who are being forced to recognize the marriages.

The interesting part is that Congress must approve the city’s laws. They have 30 days. This will not only decide whether the law stands, but will show where congress stands on the DOMA.

Please contact your representatives. Tell them to support the DOMA. Encourage them to overturn the city council’s vote.

<>Pomegranate Apple

Technorati Tags: ,,

photo by Vlastula