In Opening Salvo, GLAD Moves on Six New States

maine

See this excellent article from Drew Conrad of United Families International.  –Beetle Blogger

Standing Up for Marriage in Maine

Recently, much of the gay marriage debate has been focused in California; however, in the past few weeks the debate has returned to its roots on the East Coast. The group, Gay and Lesbian Advocates and Defenders (GLAD) has announced their plans to legalize same-sex marriage in the six New England area states.

GLAD told the Washington Times, “We can make New England a marriage-equality zone by strategically combining existing legal, electoral and on-the-ground know-how to fast-track marriage in every New England state. By 2012, we not only can have marriage equality throughout New England, we can have a road map for the rest of the country.” Two New England states, Massachusetts and Connecticut, already allow same-sex couples to enter into matrimony. Through legislation proposed in the Maine State Legislature, GLAD has taken steps to add Maine to the list of states where Same-Sex Marriage is legal.

GLAD has met opposition on several fronts, including from many pro-family organizations. The Alliance Defense Fund issued a statement responding to the proposed legislation, “Legislators in Maine have added to their agenda a bill that would redefine marriage as a union between two “people.” The bill would do away with the state’s time-honored definition of marriage as the union of one man and one woman and would recognize same-sex “marriages” from other states. State legislators should never attempt to impose a system that knowingly deprives a child of a mom and a dad. This Trojan-horse-of-a-bill deceptively states that pastors would not be forced to perform same-sex ‘marriages’ if it passes, yet this legislation will essentially wipe out every other religious freedom.”

One precedent that has been set in states where gay marriage is legal is that sexual freedom trumps religious freedom. One illustration of this example took place in March of 2006 in Massachusetts. Catholic Charities of Boston began in 1903 as an adoption agency primarily serving Catholic children left by parents who died or abandoned them. For more than 100 years this respectful organization placed children in homes with good parents who would watch over and nurture them as they grew. Catholic Charities was the most successful private adoption agency in the state, handling more adoptions than any other. They were a beacon of hope to displaced children and groups of individuals who worked unselfishly for the advancement of the helpless.

In 2006 Catholic Charities of Boston was forced to shut down their adoption department and get out of the business of finding homes for children. This decision was made after the organization was given an ultimatum from the state government: Comply with state law and adopt to gay couples, or close your doors. The Catholic church condemns homosexuality; it is a practice that is against church teachings, for this they morally could not place a child in to the home of a gay or lesbian couple. The governor at the time, Mitt Romney, attempted to pass legislation that would have allowed religious organizations an exemption from the gay adopting law, but it was voted down by his state legislature. Thus, rather than defy their religious beliefs, Catholic Charities of Boston voluntarily stopped their adoptive services.

Beverly Rice, President of United Families International commented on the Gay Marriage bill in Maine by saying, “Many people do not realize the impact that the legalization of same-sex Marriage will have on their families and marriages. Local churches will be restricted on what can be said over the pulpit. They will lose the right to decide who may be wed in their buildings, and religious organizations may be forced to shut down or compromise their beliefs. It will effect what children are taught in public schools. Parents will lose the right to decide what children learn about homosexuality and families.”

Article continued here

Advertisements

4 Comments

  1. Raytmimer said,

    February 3, 2009 at 7:39 pm

    It’s kind of interesting to see everyone scrambling to get their state’s affairs in order. Now that California’s publicized election has been won, they’ve got fear in their eyes. It has kind of a desperate feel.

  2. Lillian said,

    February 3, 2009 at 7:41 pm

    Interesting that the west coast was lost to gay activists, now the east coast is under attack, from one liberal enclave to another.

  3. February 4, 2009 at 10:56 pm

    “For more than 100 years this respectful organization placed children in homes with good parents who would watch over and nurture them as they grew.”
    “Good parents” including a small number of gay ones. I guess the remaining ones aren’t competent enough (and/or are too gay) to adopt.

    Local churches will be restricted on what can be said over the pulpit.
    They already are. There’s a difference between Free Speech and incitement. Too many from both “sides” conflate the two.

    Lillian “Interesting that the west coast was lost to gay activists, now the east coast is under attack, from one liberal enclave to another.”
    Actually, they’re everywhere. It’s just that Prop 8 was the big story.

    —-
    I’m torn. On one hand, in general I have little issue with groups that discriminate, as long as they take no public money to do so. They are free to discriminate, and I’m free not to support them. On the other hand, the law should apply to everybody.

  4. February 4, 2009 at 10:57 pm

    Wups. I forgot to close that link. My bad. The kids these days still say that, right?


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: