Preparing for Tuesday Showdown —Will it hold?
Gov. Jim Douglas’ Statement on the Veto
Text of Communication from Governor
The text of the communication from His Excellency, the Governor, whereby he vetoed and returned unsigned Senate Bill No. 115 to the Senate is as follows:
“April 6, 2009
The Honorable David A. Gibson
Secretary of the Senate
115 State Street, Drawer 33
Montpelier, VT 05633
Dear Mr. Secretary:
Pursuant to Chapter II, Section 11 of the Vermont Constitution, I am returning S.115, An Act Relating to Civil Marriage, without my signature 651 MONDAY, APRIL 06, 2009 because of my objections described herein. I do so recognizing that this is an issue that is intensely personal, with strongly held beliefs and convictions on both sides. But I am charged by our Constitution to act on this legislation and by its return, I have fulfilled that responsibility.
The question of same sex marriage is an issue that does not break cleanly as Republican or Democrat, rural or urban, religious or atheist. The decision to support or oppose is informed by an amalgam of experience, conviction and faith. These beliefs are deeply held, passionately expressed and, for many legislators, infinitely more complex than the ultimate ‘yea’ or ‘nay’ required to fulfill the duty of their office.
On such an intensely personal issue as this, all members must do as their individual conscience dictates, with the best interest of their districts in mind.
It is for those reasons that I have not sought to lobby members of my own party, or asked opponents to sustain my veto.
This legislation does not address the inequalities espoused by proponents.
Regardless of whether the term marriage is applied, federal benefits will still be denied to same sex couples in Vermont. And states that do not recognize same sex marriage or civil unions will also deny state rights and responsibilities to same sex couples married in Vermont. This bill will not change that fact.
Vermont’s civil union law has afforded the same state rights, responsibilities and benefits of marriage to same sex couples. Our civil union law serves Vermont well and I would support congressional action to extend those benefits at the federal level to states that recognize same sex unions. But I believe that marriage should remain between a man and a woman.
I hope that when the legislature makes its final decision, we can move our state forward, toward a bright future for our children and grandchildren. We still have a great deal of work ahead of us to balance our budget and get our economy going again and Vermonters are counting on us to work together to get the job done.
James H. Douglas