Not Your Mother’s Girl Scouts: Planned Parenthood Uses Girl Scouts to Promote Explicit Sex Guide at UN

Not Your Mother’s Girl Scouts

Once an innocent, clean place for our daughters to experience life, grow character and learn about life, the girl scout organization has taken a dangerous new twist.

In an appalling effort to indoctrinate the youngest, most vulnerable and impressionable of society, Planned Parenthood has begun using the Girl Scout organization as a tool to promote its blatantly  sexualized agenda.

See this from Catholic Family and Human Rights Institute:

Girl Scouts Distribute Planned Parenthood Sex GuidHappy, Healthy and Hote at UN Meeting

The World Association of Girl Scouts and Girl Guides hosted a no-adults-welcome panel at the United Nations this week where Planned Parenthood was allowed to distribute a brochure entitled “Healthy, Happy and Hot.” The event was part of the annual United Nations Commission on the Status of Women (CSW) which concludes this week.

The brochure, aimed at young people living with HIV, contains explicit and graphic details on sex, as well as the promotion of casual sex in many forms.

The story goes on from there, and includes just a portion of the explicit details and practices promoted in “Healthy, Happy and Hot”, including the admonition to “try everything”, “there’s nothing wrong” and encouraging the kids not to be afraid to “talk dirty”.

Planned Parenthood is a disaster for our young people, and there are many at the United Nations who are also adamant about preaching immorality to young children.

The New York Times recently reported that UN Population Fund is promoting a very controversial curriculum with UNESCO, that includes teaching children as young as five to be sexually active and training adolescents to advocate for abortion.

“The main effort is to try to empower young people with knowledge that could actually save their lives,” said Mr. Richmond, the Unesco H.I.V./AIDS coordinator. “We want to give them the opportunity for more informed choices than currently exist.”

To empower?  What does saving lives from AIDS have to do with promoting promiscuity????  It doesn’t!  There is no reason to encourage and promote the very promiscuity that results in millions of HIV, AIDS and other sexually transmitted diseases.  These behaviors being pushed lead not only to loss of self respect, but have permanent lifelong consequences, in many cases, even death.

“Governments and NGOs should be aware of Planned Parenthood’s insidious plan to work with UN agencies and girls’ organizations in order to profit from encouraging kids to be sexually active.”  —Wendy Wright, President of Concerned Women of America

Parents Beware.  They are promoting the very thing they claim to seek to educate against.  With the kind of information being pushed in this guide, it’s NO WONDER it’s aimed at young people living with HIV.  These kind of promiscuous lifestyles are not Healthy, Happy or Hot.  They are Sad, Miserable and Sick.  They have no place being promoted to anyone, at any level, much less vulnerable children at the United Nations.

How ironic that this would occur at a Conference on the Status of Women, a group meeting together with the goal of improving life among women.  Teaching base promiscuity will only enslave our children to the sexual whims of those who would take advantage of their youth and lack of judgment.

Our daughters are more than the sum of their physical attributes.  They are our daughters, they deserve to be taught that they have a right to expect better of themselves and others.  They have unique blessings and gifts, including the ability to create life.  They are exquisitely beautiful by design, and keepers of the next generation.  There is more there than ability.  There’s a sacred responsibility, to themselves and to the potential they hold.

Government does not have our children’s best interests at heart, neither apparently do well intentioned groups like the girl scouts.  As parents we must fight against the march of immorality creeping into our society and lives.    Teaching our children is our parental right,  our responsibility— rights and responsibilities  others are all too eager to assume.

—Beetle Blogger

Court: Doctors Must Inform Patients That “Abortion Ends Life”

lifephoto by Chaps1

A Small Victory for Life!

If courts and doctors acknowledge the life and potential of preborn babies, then the acknowledgment of preborn human rights are not far behind.  The uncomfortable reality is that it’s more than just one woman’s choice involved here.  There are two individuals involved in abortion, not just one.

Isn’t it ironic that a group calling itself “Planned Parenthood” would so completely deny the rights as well as the responsibilities of parenthood over a child?

Here’s hoping this sentiment continues to spread.  This development in child’s rights is long overdue.

—Beetle Blogger

From CRI: South Dakota Doctors Must Inform Patients “Abortion Ends Life”
In a key ruling, last week a federal judge upheld a South Dakota law requiring women be told that abortion ends a human life. The ruling came as a result of a lawsuit filed by Planned Parenthood Minnesota, North Dakota and South Dakota to challenge South Dakota’s informed consent law, passed in 2005.U.S. District Judge Karen Schreier decided that in conformance with the law, doctors must disclose “that the abortion will terminate the life of a whole, separate, unique, living human being.” However, Schreier did agree with Planned Parenthood that doctors should not be required to inform women they may suffer from suicidal thoughts or that they have an “existing relationship” with their preborn child.”This is the unraveling of Roe (v. Wade). This is a huge, fatal blow to them,” said Leslee Unruh, founder of the Alpha Center pregnancy counseling center in Sioux Falls.

Planned Parenthood is considering appealing the decision in hopes of preventing doctors from discussing the termination of human life through abortion.

“This is a monumental victory for the pro-life movement and for freedom of medical information,” explained Karen England, executive director of Capitol Resource Institute. “Abortion does end a human life and that undeniable fact will now be shared in South Dakota. Hopefully similar policies will spread throughout the country.”

Victory for Families—Planned Parenthood Defeated in Modesto

“This victory proves that when parents are informed and engaged, they can defeat even the big, well-funded organizations like Planned Parenthood.”


Victory for Modesto Parents

Modesto parents achieved a significant victory for parental rights last night. The Modesto School Board agreed to leave in place a parent-friendly confidential medical services policy. The policy requires students to obtain their parents’ signature before they are allowed to leave campus.

Organizations like Planned Parenthood, who profit from confidential medical services such as abortion or drug counseling, have been intimidating school boards with parent-friendly policies by telling them the law mandates they permit students to leave campus. However, the law clearly states that schools “may” allow students to leave, but are not required to. Parents are still in charge of whether their children leave school campus for medical treatment.

Initially, the Modesto School Board appeared to be kowtowing to the powerful special interests groups. But as soon as parents became aware of the situation, the board realized parents wouldn’t countenance such a violation of their trust in the school district.

CRI’s executive director Karen England was in attendance at the school board meeting last night. “This is a major victory for parents,” commented England. “This victory proves that when parents are informed and engaged, they can defeat even the big, well-funded organizations like Planned Parenthood.”

“Due to the remarkable coordination and cooperation amongst parents, churches, local talk radio, CRI and Pacific Justice Institute, Modesto residents have protected their children from exploitation,” observed England. “The community really pulled together and achieved an important victory for parental rights.”

CRI encourages California parents to make sure their local school district has a parent-friendly confidential medical services policy. If not, call CRI and we will help you ensure your parental rights are protected.

Parents are the Enemy

locked out

Parents are the Enemy

What kind of cannibalistic society assumes the worst of it’s parents?  Or the flipside of the same coin, what society is so selfishly absorbed in personal “rights” for children that the purpose of those rights are lost?

It’s a topic I see surfacing again and again, and it’ s not just California.  Planned Parenthood has it’s fingers in many pots in their attempts to liberate children from the care of their parents.

See this from CRI

—Beetle Blogger

CRI: Parents are the Enemy According to Some School Districts

The school board in Modesto City School District voted 4-3 to exclude parents from knowing when their children leave class for confidential medical services, in a meeting last night.

Modesto parents still have time to protect their rights, however, because the board members will cast a new vote on July 13.

“Only four people — three from Planned Parenthood, plus one activist– testified in favor of excluding parents. Every single additional testimony asked the board to include parents,” said Karen England, Executive Director of Capitol Resource Institute.

She drove to Modesto and testified with parents, at the request of citizens in Modesto.

The discussion was over proposed Board Policy 5113, which pertains to confidential medical appointments for students as young as 12 years of age.

The associate superintendents who proposed this policy claimed that it would “meet a mandate for such policy and regulation.” BP 5113’s actual language was written by the California School Boards Association, which advises many districts on their school board policies.

In reality, there is no mandate.

State law says that “school authorities MAY excuse any pupil” (Cal. Educ.C. 46010.1, emphasis added). England pointed this out during the meeting. The law provides permission for implementing confidential release, but it certainly does not impose a mandate.

There are over 900 public school districts in California and many do not offer their students confidential medical release. Modesto’s current policy is parent- friendly.

Unfortunately, Modesto has sided with Planned Parenthood for now, against parents.

This vote was only the first reading, however, and the board’s final vote will be at its second reading during the next meeting. CRI is hopeful that one or two board members can be persuaded to vote for parental knowledge of what happens to their children at school.

Modesto parents and pastors left the meeting fired up. They are ready to tell their communities what is going on — so that more families can get involved, because people are still unaware.

Here are four ways to take action and defend parents’ rights in Modesto: Contact the board members, contact the media, educate your friends, and show up at the next board meeting.

Contact every board member, so they can go to the final vote saying that the community has spoken. Urge them to enact a parent-friendly policy. Tell them to include parents, not exclude parents. It is possible to sway some votes and protect families in Modesto.

Steven Grenbeaux – voted to exclude parents
Board President
Term: 2007-2011

Kimberly Gerber Spina – voted to exclude parents
Vice President
Term: 2007-2011

Nancy Cline – voted to INCLUDE parents
Term: 2001-2009

Steve Collins – voted to exclude parents
Term: 2005-2009

Gary Lopez – voted to INCLUDE parents
Term: 1999-2011

Cindy Marks – voted to INCLUDE parents
Term: 1997-2009

Belinda Rolicheck – voted to exclude parents
Term: 2005-2009

Planned Parenthood in Complicit Statutory Rape Coverup

Video: Mona Lisa Documentary Exposing Planned Parenthood’s Felony Crimes

Against Women and Children

Thanks to CRFI for this update on the Mona Lisa Project.  This is the group that helped get the thugs from planned parenthood kicked out of Orange County in California.

“If an adult-child sex relationship is revealed—Law Enforcement must be contacted immediately.”  —Arizona Law

See your tax dollars at work in Arizona as they cover up the statutory rape of a 15 year old girl.  These people have no place being a publicly funded organizations in our communities.  They ought to have no place doing business anywhere.

—Beetle Blogger

Planned Parenthood Hides Statutory Rape in AZ

Planned Parenthood employees in two Phoenix clinics covered up the statutory rape of a minor girl last July 9, as seen in video footage released by Live Action Films on Wednesday.

“There’s another problem. He’s a lot older than me,” said Jackie Stollar, a college student posing as a pregnant 15 year old in the documentary-style film.

This is the fourth installment in the Mona Lisa Project, a national undercover investigation of Planned Parenthood, conducted by the college students who run Live Action Films. Each release shows clinic employees ignoring or willing to hide cases of statutory rape.

In Phoenix, Stollar entered a clinic at 5651 N. 7th St. and told a staff member about her problem. “My boyfriend’s like — ‘you need to get this taken care of ’cause I’m gonna get in trouble,'” she said.

“Is he older?” the staff member asked. “I mean everything’s confidential here, you know what I mean?” she said.

“He’s 27,” said Lila Rose, President of Live Action, who acted as Stollar’s 15 year old friend. Rose is also an undergraduate.

“The main concern is that nobody’s forcing you to do something that you don’t want to do,” clinic staff told Stollar during their conversation, after confirming that she wanted the abortion.

Arizona law makes adult-minor sex a felony and mandates the reporting of such crimes.

The girls were at their second clinic of the day, seeking counsel on how to obtain a judicial bypass so that Stollar would not need to notify her parents. “From what I hear, it’s a very easy process,” a Planned Parenthood employee at the first clinic told them.

When Stollar expressed concern at the first clinic that a judge would ask about her boyfriend’s age, she was advised to confide in the Planned Parenthood counselor. “She wants to help anybody who comes to her,” a staff member said.

“By keeping information about rapists confidential, Planned Parenthood enables sexual predators to continue violating young girls,” Rose said on Wednesday.

“What we need is a strong attorney general or county attorney. . . to really take this evidence seriously,” she said.

Planned Parenthood did not return a call for comment.

Watch the seven minute documentary online and see earlier editions of Mona Lisa videos on the Live Action website.

Video: Statutory rape concealed

Orange County Votes to Defund Planned Parenthood

by Thomas Beck Photo

by Thomas Beck Photo

Orange County Chooses Life!

Great to hear!  Another example of people taking action and making a difference on issues that matter most.  Let’s hear more of these!  Planned Parenthood…what an egregious misnomer!  Public funds ought to be used for many things, but not destroying life.

Watching the political landscape it’s clear that it’s not just enough to vote anymore.  Getting involved at the local level is the way to make a difference for families.  Congratulations Orange County on becoming “Planned Parenthood” free!

—Beetle Blogger

Good News: Orange County Votes to Defund Planned Parenthood

The Orange County Board of Supervisors voted 5-0 to end a county contract with Planned Parenthood, in a meeting on Tuesday, after hours of testimony for and against the contract.

“We’d never had a debate on this,” said Supervisor John Moorlach, who discovered Orange County’s contract with Planned Parenthood and led efforts to suspend it.

The suspended contract, worth $291,788, covered comprehensive reproductive education for teens and preteens. This included birth control, STDs, and abstinence. Not suspended was a $50,000 contract with Planned Parenthood for data entry on child immunizations, which is set to expire in June 2009. Planned Parenthood has indicated that it will not seek to renew this contract.

Though the larger contract did not directly fund abortions, supervisors were concerned about the fungibility of money. “I don’t believe the county should be funding abortion, and I don’t believe the county really should be involved in funding an organization who performs about 35 percent of the abortions in the country,” Supervisor Chris Norby said in Tuesday’s meeting, according to the Orange County Register.

Capitol Resource Institute sent out an Action Alert on Monday of this week, urging Orange County residents to contact their Board of Supervisors. “We got good calls,” Moorlach said.

“I have a good board to work with, and I think some of them were just as surprised as I was that that’s what they were voting on,” he said.

From Moorlach Post-Mortem On Planned Parenthood Vote

International Petition to Protect Life


Life is precious wherever it is found.  Protect Life.  –Beetle Blogger

On December 10, 2008 a Pro-Life coalition including United Families International gathered at the UN to present a Pro-Life petition.  The reason for the petition was two fold:


  1. To celebrate the 60th Anniversary of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights
  2. In response to a Pro-Abortion petition presented by Planned Parenthood and Marie Stopes International

The Pro-Life petition contained over 340,000 names gathered over a 60 day period, while the opposition petition claimed 651 names in nearly a year of work.  Due to the relatively short amount of time that the Pro-Life petition was available, United Families International and the Pro-Life coalition have decided to keep the petition open until September 2009 when it will be re-presented to the UN.  We invite all who believe in the sanctity of life to add their names to the International Petition to Protect Life.

The petition requests that all member nations and states interpret the UNDHR to mean that:

The right to life, liberty and security is for every person; that each child born or unborn, has the right to birth and a full, natural life. That a child has the right to a mother and a father, of full age, within the bonds of marriage defined as between a man and a woman.  And, that the parents have the right to raise and educate their children without any limitation due to race, religion, culture or nationality.

CLICK HERE to add your name to the petition and join Pro-Lifers around the globe in protecting life.

Sticks and Stones Propaganda in Schools


Gay Activists From GLSEN Silencing Criticism and Redefining “Hate” for the Next Generation

As part of “No Name-Calling Week”, schools will be teaching children that those who disagree with the homosexual lifestyle are motivated by “hate” and the implied message is that you have to accept the behavior choices in order to accept the person.

This public education message, sponsored by GLSEN, a group dedicated to bringing homosexuality to schools, sows seeds of confusion about sexual behavior and moral decision making.  Labeling and stereotyping opposition to gay activist doctrine as “hate” glosses over the many arguments out there and presents a false choice to children:  Hate or embrace!

Why are schools partnering with sexual propagandists?  Can’t we teach respect and civility without forcing the redefinition of religion and sexual ethics?

See these clips from the WorldNetDaily:

The No Name-Calling Week Coalition, created by Simon & Schuster Children’s Publishing and the Gay, Lesbian and Straight Education Network, or GLSEN, consists of more than 40 national partner organizations. The coalition organized the first No Name-Calling Week in schools across the nation during the week of March 1-5, 2004. This year, No Name-Calling Week will take place next week.

The website claims it wants to focus national attention on the problem of name-calling in schools. Its GLSEN sponsor, however, offers a web page that specifically lists terms and their definitions, including condemnation of “heterosexism,” defined as the “attitude that heterosexuality is the only valid or acceptable sexual orientation.”

It also defines “ally” as someone “who supports and stands up for the rights of LBGT people.”  The GLSEN site labels “homophobia” as the “fear of lesbians and gay men.”

“No Name-Calling” campaign spokesman Daryl Presgraves told WND the campaign is intended to allow students to discuss “all types of hurtful names” including religious slurs, racist slurs and those about sexual orientation.

Other sponsors listed on the promotion’s website include the Anti-Defamation League, Educators for Social Responsibility, the National Education Association and the Planned Parenthood Federation of America.

What about those who disagree with the homosexual lifestyle?  Is it right to call them bigots or haters or homophobes for their beliefs?  What makes one label better than another?

Bullying, name calling, and every other disrespectful habit can and should be discouraged in schools but the solution is not to endorse homosexuality, and it’s certainly not creating a new class of acceptable names to call people.


GLSEN advocates homosexuality by obscuring the line between people and actions.  Dealing in fine lines and sophistries, they teach children that gay behavior is something worthy of respect and defense, rather than teaching respect for the person, regardless of behavior.  You can have respectful dissent from behavior and still respect the person, but because these groups are pushing the gay agenda, stifling dissent through “hate” labeling and softening attitudes about behavior is what it’s all about.  With one little twist, all of a sudden, Jesus’ teachings to love the sinner, not the sin, turns into hate speech.

Sound familiar?  This rhetorical sophistry is rampant worldwide in gay advocates’ march toward sexual enlightenment.

Parents should be alarmed that groups like GLSEN and Planned Parenthood have such unlimited access to children in schools.  Protect your children!  Corrupted moral ideas can be destructive weapons, and creating support for those ideas among our impressionable next generation is exactly what they are after.

–Beetle Blogger

FOCA in Focus for Families

Obama’s Promise of Disaster

Obama has promised to sign the “Freedom of Choice Act” as president.  This legislation would be a disaster for state’s rights, parental rights and most importantly, children’s rights.

“The first thing I’d do as President is sign the Freedom of Choice Act. That’s the first thing I’d do.”

With that one pen stroke, he has promised to remove all barriers to abortion on the state and federal levels by mandate.  No more parental consent, or information given to girls looking into abortions, no controls whatsoever on this incredibly destructive practice.

I completely oppose this unilateral legislation. Abortion should always be the rare exception, never the rule.

See for more information and to join the fight against Planned Parenthood and this legislation.   —Beetle Blogger

Sign the Fight FOCA Petition

The Freedom of Choice Act (FOCA) would eliminate every restriction on abortion nationwide.

  • FOCA will do away with state laws on parental involvement, on partial birth abortion, and on all other protections.
  • FOCA will compel taxpayer funding of abortions.
  • FOCA will force faith-based hospitals and healthcare facilities to perform abortions.
  • Barack Obama believes this legislation will “end the culture wars.”

To him, “ending the culture wars” means eradicating every state and federal law on abortion — laws that the majority of Americans support.

The FightFOCA petition will be sent to key Members of Congress upon the re-introduction of the Freedom of Choice Act in the 111th Congress, and to President-Elect Obama.